Bitfinex accidentally paid a $24 million USDT transfer fee

Bitfinex accidentally paid a $24 million USDT transfer fee

One of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges made a costly mistake. A $100,000 Tether transfer was met with the highest transaction fee ever.

Mistakes can be very expensive

As DeversiFy reported on its Twitter feed, “on September 27, a deposit transaction was made using a hardware wallet from the main DeversiFi user interface. It was charged an erroneously high gas fee.”

The transaction in question was made on the Ethereum network. Its purpose was to transfer Tether in the amount of $100,000 USDT. The funds were to go from Bitfinex to DeversiFy.

As Etherescan reports, Bitfinex paid 7676.6 ETH for the execution of the order, which was approximately $23.6 million at the time. This fee thus became the highest ever. Since the transfer was running on IP-1559, an additional 0.05 ETH was burned during its execution.

DeversiFy is in the process of investigating the reasons behind such incident. However, it points out that the users’ funds are fully safe. The incident also has no impact on the exchange’s operations.

Miner refunds most of the fees

As we learn from the DeversiFy profile, the very next day the exchange received information that the miner decided to return most of the transaction fee that was paid. Out of 7676.6 ETH, 7626 ETH was returned to the owners. This means that the miner kept more than 50 Ether for himself.

Transaction fees don’t have to be high at all

Although the Ethereum network is struggling with transaction costs, they are not as high as the current situation presents. The execution of the above order was most likely influenced by the human factor. Some market participants believed that the problem of fees would be solved with the EIP-1559 update, which was part of the London hard fork in August. This was obviously a wrong assumption, as manifested by the current transfer fees, which have remained at similar levels on the Ethereum network for quite some time. Currently, making a token exchange on Uniswap, based on the Ethereum blockchain, already costs more than $70. Operations on smart contracts, on the other hand, are even more expensive.

In comparison, the situation on Bitcoin is much better. The recent transfer in the area of the largest cryptocurrency, worth USD 2 billion, is loud. The commission here was barely 0.00001713 BTC, or about $0.72.

Disclaimer: Blockbulletin does not take accountability of investments based on the information of the website. We highly advice readers to make extensive research prior to any invest

Share this article

More news

Mark Cuban Rug pull titan coin

Mark Cuban victim of a “Rug Pull”

On Wednesday, June 16, 2021, the TITAN Coin cryptocurrency plummeted in value, from initially as much as over $60 to just over $0 within a 24-hour period.…
NFT support on XRP Ledger from Ripple delayed - here's why!

Criminals aim for Ledger users

A sophisticated new attack on hardware wallet Ledger Exactly one year ago this July 2020, Bitcoin (BTC) storage hardware wallet provider Ledger was victim to a hacking…
ECB pushes for digital euro

European Central Bank pushes for digital Euro

Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, while often seen as speculative assets, are constantly growing in popularity. They are inevitably changing the way people conduct transactions, which in turn…
Anonymous hits at Elon Musk cryptocurrency bitcoin

Anonymous hits back at Elon Musk

The year 2021 is a time of growth in the cryptocurrency market. However, they are repeatedly disturbed by Elon Musk’s tweets. We reported on the substance of…
El Salvador first country to accept Bitcoin

El Salvador first country to accept Bitcoin

The Bitcoin 2021 conference that took place in Miami hosted many special speakers covering very interesting topics. But what would the biggest event in history be without…
All articles loaded
No more articles to load

Learn

It seems we can't find what you're looking for.

Analyses

It seems we can't find what you're looking for.

Latest news

All articles loaded
No more articles to load