Australian regulator takes Meta to court for publishing fraudulent cryptocurrency ads

cryptocurrency

Scam ads for cryptocurrency services have become a common practice on Australia’s Facebook. One of the affected individuals lost up to $500,000. The case has been addressed by the local regulator.

Fraudulent investment schemes

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), has decided to initiate proceedings against the company Meta (formerly Facebook), for allowing the publication of fraudulent ads on its pages.

As it turns out, in Australia, Facebook recently published ads of investment programs based on cryptocurrencies. Given the fact that images of famous people were used to promote them, it would seem that they were fully verified and above all legitimate. Characters encouraging investment include: Dick Smith, presenter David Koch and former politician Mike Baird. They presented the opportunities behind the use of digital assets. When asked about their involvement in the campaign, they denied ever endorsing, supporting, or even participating in similar ventures.

The ads present on Facebook contained links that took users to fake articles. Subsequently, the victims were encouraged to invest their funds in these digital asset-based schemes. Those who were undecided were put under additional pressure by phone calls to complete the deal. Those who gave in and took the risk irretrievably lost their funds. The highest amount that was lost was nearly 500,000 dollars.

ACCC position

According to the Australian commission, the Meta company had full knowledge that these ads were being published, but took no action. 

ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, commented on the events as follows:

“The crux of our case is that Meta is responsible for the ads it publishes on its platform (…) Meta should have been doing more to detect and then remove false or misleading content on Facebook to prevent consumers from falling victim to outright scammers. “

This type of practice led to many losses for Australians. Another effect was that the reputations of well-known public figures have been tarnished. As the case is related to the cryptocurrency segment, they have also been shrouded in disrepute.

Unfortunately, similar activities are common in spaces like Twitter and YouTube, for example. Difficulties in dealing with scammers have an impact on the temporary slowdown of cryptocurrency adoption in the world.

Disclaimer: Blockbulletin does not take accountability of investments based on the information of the website. We highly advice readers to make extensive research prior to any invest

Share this article

More news

All articles loaded
No more articles to load

Learn

Bitcoin blocks

What are Bitcoin blocks?

Bitcoin (BTC) is currently one of the most popular digital currencies in the world. How does it differ from the…
Bitcoin forks

Bitcoin forks

Bitcoin’s history, although short, is quite bumpy. The reason for this is not only the dynamic price movements or the…
Ripple

What is XRP?

XRP is one of the top cryptocurrencies on the market. A project with a long and also quite controversial history…
What is Vechain VET

What is Vechain (VET)

The next cryptocurrency we take under the microscope is VeChain (VET). We will take a look at what sets it…
what is uniswap uni

What is Uniswap (UNI)?

In the article titled “What is Binance Coin (BNB),” we illustrated an exchange that, for the purpose of its business,…
Terra LUNA

What is Terra (LUNA)?

This time we take a look at another project that dived deep into the hearts of investors. What exactly is…
What is Stellar Lumens XLM

What is Stellar Lumens (XLM)

Some projects in the cryptocurrency world, although independent, are interrelated. One example is Litecoin, commonly referred to as Bitcoin’s little…
All articles loaded
No more articles to load

Analyses

All articles loaded
No more articles to load

Latest news

All articles loaded
No more articles to load